The Desperate Dishonesty of Doug Chamberlain

“And Brutus is an honorable man.” – Julius Caesar, Act 3, Scene 2

If you haven’t been sprayed yet by the rhetoric coming out of the Republican primary showdown in Ohio House District 85, look alive. Collateral damage won’t be confined to Champaign, Logan, and Shelby Counties.

I would wager that most sophomores who have passed a basic Western Civilization course at Urbana University could tell us that in Ancient Rome, the Senate appointed two men (known as “Censors”) to judge the moral character and activities of elected officials. The sentiment–a tad ironic, since Rome’s legacy is more political-philosophical than moral–reflects what all democratic peoples instinctively know:

Our leaders should be above reproach–in morals and in messaging.

Right now these sophomores and thousands of other Ohioans are waking up to another stroke of irony. The “Honorable” Doug Chamberlain, a family court judge and career lawyer, has let slip the dogs of war against frontrunner Nino Vitale with two flagrantly dishonest ad hominem attacks.

These attacks are the very essence of desperation and dishonor. That they fly the banner of a family court judge–an applier of the law regarding society’s most vital institution–is saddening and disturbing.

At least his honor the judge has provided us, for the benefit of our instruction, with Exhibit A of some of the worst-ever messaging from a self-described conservative.

For starters, it is deliberately deceptive. As the judge probably would tell us in court, the facts speak for themselves. Consider them as reported by the Urbana Daily Citizen on 3/11/14, the day after a candidate forum at Urbana University:

“Vitale said that the U.S. is becoming a ‘fatherless society.’ Surprisingly he agreed with a quote from [then-Senator] Barack Obama that fatherlessness is a direct cause of addictions and crimes that plague society.

“‘I’d like to see government at all levels encourage the family to stay together,’ he said. ‘I’d like to see another million man march,” adding that he would have them “march right back into their homes and take care of their kids, take care of their wife, and lead.’”

That’s pretty deep, so the judge simplified Mr. Vitale’s message for him and mailed out the following bastardized version:

“. . . Barack Obama . . . I agree with him 100%.”

To those (such as myself) who heard Mr. Vitale’s remarks in person–not merely in context but in bonafide grammatical clauses and sentences–it is clear why Mr. Chamberlain needed a Tommy gun’s worth of ellipses for this hit job. Objection, Your Honor.

Ohio is on hard times when a family court judge–who at the forum highlighted his own role in many times signing papers to remove children from parental custody–misinterprets a call for fathers to lead their families as an opportunity to smear a fellow family man to score cheap points in the Republican primary.

Vitale was only echoing the very point that the Heritage Foundation routinely makes when defending natural marriage policy: that even Barack Obama once understood the importance of fathers and the crisis of marital and family breakdown.[1] Does Doug Chamberlain?

A second mailer by Mr. Chamberlain attempts to exploit Mr. Vitale’s boyhood circumstances, utterly beyond his control, which have led to him having more than one last name over the course of his lifetime. Stars, hide your fires! Yet the judge would have voters ignorantly conclude from such “evidence” that Mr. Vitale is a shapeshifter. One wonders how many shapeshifters–citizens whose names have changed because of parents’ remarriage, or adoption, or immigration–fill Champaign, Logan, and Shelby Counties–and whether the judge holds it against them. Objection, Your Honor.

Surely something is rotten in the state of Ohio: Judge Chamberlain’s messaging, and the skewed moral compass directing it.

It is precisely these kinds of gaffes that help us see how pernicious we conservatives can be when we fail to address even a single issue, statement, or fragment of substance when we “contribute” to the marketplace of ideas.

Perhaps our “leaders”–may we cease to follow them–resort to cheap tactics because they know they cannot compete in this marketplace.  Rather than serve the public by taking their high-cost, low-value leadership off the shelf, however, they resort to preying upon–or in this case, cultivating–citizen ignorance to fleece the electorate.

As to Mr. Chamberlain’s own market value to the electorate: one need not gut his remarks of their true meaning to walk away with sticker shock.  When asked at the March 10 forum for thoughts on fixing Ohio’s broken education system, for instance, the judge’s protracted response failed to articulate a single solution, while dismissing “charter schools” as “a failure in Ohio.” This should not surprise us since Mr. Chamberlain also failed to come out swinging for a single free-market principle all evening, in contrast to the other candidates.

Also sparse were remarks from the judge on family values. Perhaps Mr. Vitale can point him toward a quotation or two.

Judge Chamberlain should tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. If we cannot trust him on the campaign trail, we cannot trust him in Columbus.

Here is one vote for his recusal.


Michael Hamilton is the Executive Director of the Conservative Republican Leadership Committee and the Executive Editor of Ohio Conservative Review.



[1] “These statistics have penetrated American life to such a great extent that even President Barack Obama refers to them as well known:

We know the statistics—that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. They are more likely to have behavioral problems, or run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves. And the foundations of our community are weaker because of it.[14]

Fathers matter, and marriage helps to connect fathers to mothers and children.

–Anderson, Ryan T. “Marriage: What It Is, Why It Matters, and the Consequences of Redefining It.” 11 March 2013.


Related posts